BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2004 Field measurements of particle-capture efficiency and size selection by caddisfly nets and larvae
Christopher Edler, Ted Georgian
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Net-spinning caddisflies are an important group of filter feeders in many streams, but the mechanisms by which their nets capture particles are poorly understood. Our objective was to determine the effects of particle size on the efficiency of particle capture by 2 species of net-spinning caddisflies, Ceratopsyche morosa and C. sparna. We measured particle capture by nets and ingestion by larvae. We used a mathematical model that incorporated drag and the presence of a near-bed boundary layer to predict reduction of flow passing through a caddisfly net. We evaluated model predictions by measuring the velocity of flow through a scaled model of a C. sparna net in a laboratory flume. Velocity of water through the net was reduced 45% at free-stream velocities of 71 cm/s and 36% at 99 cm/s. We released known quantities of 3 sized particles (Artemia nauplii, 528 μm; corn pollen, 85 μm; paper mulberry pollen, 12 μm) in several stream riffles to determine whether size-selective capture and ingestion occurred. Both C. morosa and C. sparna nets captured particles primarily by sieving; particles smaller than the mesh size (paper mulberry pollen) were caught at 28× lower efficiencies than sievable particles by C. morosa nets and 2.2× lower efficiencies by C. sparna nets. Larvae ingested 73 to 83% of the largest particles captured by nets, compared to 4 to 6% for the smallest particles. The overall probability of particle capture and ingestion of the largest, sievable particles was ∼400× greater than for the smallest, nonsievable particles, with the difference much greater for C. morosa than for C. sparna. We compared actual rates of particle capture to theoretical predictions. Ceratopsyche morosa captured sievable particles at 34% of the predicted rate, whereas nonsievable particles were captured at 0.4% of the predicted rate. Ceratopsyche sparna showed less difference between capture mechanisms, and captured sievable particles at 5% and nonsievable particles at 1.1% of predicted rates. Natural seston concentrations were skewed in the direction of smaller particles; the smallest size class, 0.5 to 30 μm, made up 65% of the total ash-free dry mass of the seston. Large particles (>65 μm) were captured at higher efficiencies by nets and ingested more readily by larvae; therefore, we predict that they will be the primary food items of 5th-instar larvae of both species studied despite their rarity in the water column.

Christopher Edler and Ted Georgian "Field measurements of particle-capture efficiency and size selection by caddisfly nets and larvae," Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23(4), 756-770, (1 December 2004). https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2004)023<0756:FMOPEA>2.0.CO;2
Received: 18 December 2003; Accepted: 5 August 2004; Published: 1 December 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
15 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
hydrodynamic model
net-spinning caddisflies
nonsieving
particle-capture efficiency
seston
sieving
size selection
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top